A contrast in style. Waxman makes himself an idiot. He never expresses an opinion or listens to the input. He only berates the messenger. This seems to be the standard Liberal argument to all opposition to the growth of government. It is tough to actually find the argument for these tax increases. I have no problem finding complaints about people that do not support tax increases on (100% of Americans). I wish they would defend their position on taxing every American and simply stand their ground.
I have to respect Newt’s reaction in simply sitting back and smirking while Waxman goes off. If you opponent is making and idiot of himself let him go. Newt has learned a lot since his time as speaker.
He does get a few nice points squeezed in their on the fundamental difference of using incentives for people versus penalizing people.
Taking in this context the basic argument from Waxman is that the government needs more money. How do you plan to give us more?! Never a brain cell thinking about the people, a complete view of everything from the government point of view.
Thanks for the interesting information.
It was and with me. We can communicate on this theme.
You are not right. I can defend the position.
Hi, Congratulations to the site owner for this marvelous work you’ve done. It has lots of useful and interesting data.