www.editedforbias.com » Liberal

Dropping health care good for your health?

Ed F Bias — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 03:02:31 +0000

“For the sake of those dying people” I figured I would take a look into some possible causes. You have probably heard that 40,000 people a year die because they do not have health care. I found this an interesting connection. Over a million people die each year with heath care. It got me thinking.

According to the Census bureau website there were 46.3 million people without heath care (page 27) last year and 255.1 million people with heath care. The last death rate numbers they have posted is 2005 at 2.448 million. Looking back to 2005 the census bureau posts 45.9million uninsured (Table 8). That gives us a death rate of 1 in 1157 for uninsured and 1 in 104 for the insured. Yep, the death rate of those with health care is 10 times that of those without. Everyone..TIME TO DROP YOUR HEATH CARE!!!!

All this really proves is that those trying to push Health Care Reform are simply throwing out numbers that sound outrageous. Building a simple cause and effect relationship in such a complex system as health care, coverage and death rates is rediculous.

Liberalism is Evil [Special Edition]: Racism

Ed F Bias — Thu, 17 Sep 2009 03:33:40 +0000

Jimmy Carter open the door and now it is time to level the playing field. “I think an overwhelming portion of the intensely demonstrated animosity toward President Barack Obama is based on the fact that he is a black man,” Carter said. Liberals everywhere are defending Carter but in so doing throwing him under the bus as well. In their defense of him they will continually misquote him. They say that he was referring to a small fringe element at the tea party rallies that depict Obama as Hilter or an African prince, etc. Trust me the quote is the quote and there is no “small fringe” element in this. Carter was laying the groundwork that “all opposition” is racism and he is not backing down.

There are some idiots at the rallies (on either side). I love the open ended questions from the Left. “Are you saying this NO racial element in this?” How did we go from “an overwhelming portion” to “none”? That tactic not going to work. Events and publicity bring out the morons but they are a small minority and tend to be shouted down by the crowd.

So let’s take a quick view of history. Which large political group elected (multiple times) and promoted to power a prominent KKK member? Which political group fosters antisemitic rhetoric? Which political group jokes about needing an Indian accent in a 7-11? Which political group supported slavery and dominated the South during the Civil War?

Let’s see … Democrats, Democrats, Democrats, Democrats

But I know it just can’t be true? What about the Nazi’s and White supremacists? Those are nut jobs outside of either mainstream party. Nazi’s are Socialists and many White supremacists anti-government anarchists. So that gives us one far left and one far right.

Let’s look beyond the obvious racism of those above and deeper into the basic views of of the parties and policies. In the end it is here in the deep rooted beliefs the true nature reveals itself.

True Conservatives view all men a created equal, see them all for their God given talents and believe that given freedom and opportunity anyone from any background can achieve success in America. Conservatives celebrate the successes of lesser educated Irish and Italian immigrants in the early 1900s. The ability of those fleeing political prosecution in the Asia pacific and oversees in the 1940s. The ability for all of America to lift itself out of the Great Depression. This country has made mistakes and we have corrected those mistakes and together as Americans we move forward.

Liberals view Americans as groups not individuals. In those defined groups people are marginalized and stereotyped; the White Catholic (racist pig), The Greedy Jew (getting rich off of the poor), and the poor… When a Liberal talks about “the poor” do you envision that they are thinking about the rural Tennessee or Arkansas families living in ramshackle homes with clothing that needs to last a few years and almost no income…or do you think they see the single black mother with her three kids living in Government housing in the inner city? Based on the media coverage and the dominance of Democrats in big cities, I think you know the answer.

But you see these women need our money and Government assistance. Why? Why is this community in such need? They always ask for the money and it seems like the nice thing to do, but reality is that this funding is pure guilt based on racism. Democrats believe that blacks have been pushed down and hurt by America and that they need and deserve special assistance. What they leave out is that THEY pushed them down THEY mistreated them and that THEY are now funding the destruction of the black community, the destruction of the black family…partially out of guilt and retribution and partially because in their hearts they believe that blacks can’t succeed without the Government’s help. Isn’t that racist, pure and simple? They outwardly project that it is due to the racism of others; of the larger American community. Playing group against group, American against American to secure more power for themselves and more depedance for those less fortunate.

Conservatives reject that outright. For every racist there are dozens of other Americans that see people as people and mostly as Americans. Inner city blacks just like the Irish and the Italians, the Asians and the whole U.S. after the Great Depression have the innate God given talents to do anything if given the freedom to do so. Creating a society that accepts failure, pays for failure and expects mediocrity is downright evil, whether it be guilt or something worse.

Stop the labels, stop the guilt, stop the excuses and stop the projection. The fact is we simply disagree on issues; maybe due to our backgrounds. That is not racism. It is a point on contention and dialogue. When you try to play that card all we hear is, “I have nothing to say, you are winning the argument…so HERE..!”

Parade: Honesty about Hollywood Liberalism

Ed F Bias — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:05:41 +0000

I seldom read Parade magazine in the Sunday paper but these weeks caught my eye. The lead story was about Shia LaBeouf of Transformer, Indiana Jones IV and Holes fame. But that was not what caught my eye. What caught me was the “In Over His Head?” Interesting…what was up?

I was surprised to read a well written article about young stars and their propensity for getting into trouble. But what was almost unbelievable was the honesty of Shia about his own actions and Hollywood as a whole. ”I don’t handle fame well. Most actors on most days don’t think they’re worthy. I have no idea where this insecurity comes from, but it’s a God sized hole.” This explains a lot but he goes on, “Actors live dependant on being validated by other people’s opinions, ” he continues. “I have no credentials. To my mind talent doesn’t really exist. Talent is like a card player’s luck.” Maybe it is because he is still young but old enough to articulate his position but his words struck me square in the face.

What am I going on about? The clarity with which he explains the Liberal tilt in Hollywood. I believe it was Barbara Streisand that said something about “being a winner of life’s lottery.” The powerful in Hollywood reach a level so high above “normal” and with so little self-confidence and hard work that they believe they are not worthy. That guilt and self loathing makes them grab on to charities and other equally public actions to create worth and positive self-opinion.

Beyond that, they believe that noone else of means is worthy either. Those that are not involved in similar public philanthropy are even less deserving. In a general sense, Liberals believe we are all born with the same abilities and same chance to be successful and they were simply the lucky one(s). They have very little understanding about real business and hard work that creates the majority of wealth in this country. This lack of understanding leads to policies to redirect that wealth to those that “luck” has somehow avoided.

This article drove these points home in his own words, it is worth a read.

This is what “news” has come to?

Ed F Bias — Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:05:36 +0000

For Obama, hipness is what it is

This would not be so bad if this was Entertainment Tonight or even the Today Show, which are “almost- news agencies” already. But this was Politico. They spend about three written pages showcasing his “accomplishments” in being hip. Sighting authors of hip culture. I thought they we somewhat still a decent news source. My bad.

But there is a silver lining to all of this. In fact two. First is that it shows the absolute need for a change in media and they way in whcih the report. A refocusing on the facts and news and away from all of the emotion driven suck-up-id-ness. The second point is, “this is what they have to tout for 100 days of effort?” So he is hip. Ineffective, destructive and moving us towards Statism. But he is hip! The struggle to find something of value to portray on behalf of this president has gotten this tough.

Politico, in trying to showcase his talents, has also highlighted his weaknesses. Unfortunately, his weakness at this point is being President.

I am sure you have all heard Republications are violent racists at rallies.

Ed F Bias — Thu, 23 Oct 2008 10:00:00 +0000

Have any of you heard the Secret service has interviewed their own agents, police and attendees and noone actually heard what Singleton claims he heard. But you see it must be true because the media is always truthful and there is no way he misheard it or had any bias. I am sure all of the news outlets that ran with the stories for days, spent at least some time (a blink of an eyelash) to follow-up on the Secret Service agents investigation.

Do you think Singleton will be investigated as deeply as Joe the Plumber? I would like to know how he is registered? What his religious affiliations are. I forgot that is only important to exposes the “crazies on the right wing” and not for these high minded press-folk.

Media bias is so obvious at times… but since that is “Right Wing fear mongering”, no sense in basing an opinion on the facts at hand. Have you seen the “outrage” over the verbal abuse of McCain supported in New York or the beating of a female McCain supporter with the stick of her own sign?

Pending breaking story, might be too sensational… Or the robber that scratched a B into the face of his victim because she had a McCain sticker on her car?

Update 10/24: I know what the B stands for “B…h”. She lied. Stupid people on both sides. This does not help…. This is going to allow the media to concentrate on her as the “represnative” of McCain supporters and ignore the truth about the nuts on both sides. This may change the dynamic away from Joe the Plumber and over to the Vast Right Wing ConspiracyKooks.. Let me say that I think “SB” fits better.