<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.editedforbias.com &#187; big fat tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.editedforbias.com/tag/big-fat-tax/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.editedforbias.com</link>
	<description>Leveraging the power of community to combat the power of the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cap and Trade&#8230;aka&#8230; A Great BIG TAX!</title>
		<link>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/05/cap-and-tradeaka-a-great-big-tax.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/05/cap-and-tradeaka-a-great-big-tax.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 03:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed F Bias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big fat tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cap and trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://editedforbias.com/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those are not my words but the words from Rep Dingell (a Democrat) that supports the concept.   Even more interesting is that he even mentions that we examples of it being tried and it simply fails.   So the answer, of course, is to do it anyway and tax on the other end as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are not my words but the <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSlK9312nWc" target="_blank">words from Rep Dingell</a> (a Democrat) that supports the concept.   Even more interesting is that he even mentions that we examples of it being tried and it simply fails.   So the answer, of course, is to do it anyway and tax on the other end as well.</p>
<p> <object width="325" height="250" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/sSlK9312nWc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sSlK9312nWc&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p>As with many of these posts.  The basic words are only the beginning but they are enlightening.  Cap and Trade is not about the environment (not to Dingell) it is about Revenue.    I will say for All Gore it seems to be more about the environment.    And since he believes in this Carbon credits crap, I will at least give him credit for being honest.  Even honest enough to mention his &#8220;world view&#8221; of taxation.</p>
<p>For the other side of this discussion&#8230; <a href="http://www.taxfoundation.org/blog/show/24692.html" target="_blank">the Heritage Foundation has published</a> a simple read about Cap and Trade.    What I find most interesting is that both sides agree&#8230; that the American people to not understand that it is <strong>A TAX and a GREAT BIG TAX</strong>.</p>
<p>Now you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/05/cap-and-tradeaka-a-great-big-tax.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

