<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.editedforbias.com &#187; left wing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.editedforbias.com/tag/left-wing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.editedforbias.com</link>
	<description>Leveraging the power of community to combat the power of the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>American Thinker: Hits the NFL and says it well</title>
		<link>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/10/american-thinker-hits-the-nfl-and-says-it-well.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/10/american-thinker-hits-the-nfl-and-says-it-well.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed F Bias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://editedforbias.com/?p=303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The obvious bias of the media and the &#8220;outrage&#8221; that a conservative like Limbaugh would use his money to buy and NFL team was obvious to most.    Atlanta is a nice focal point to see the differences.   Where were the protests when Turner (aka Jane Fonda&#8217;s husband) owned sports teams?   What about the reinstatement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious bias of the media and the &#8220;outrage&#8221; that a conservative like Limbaugh would use his money to buy and NFL team was obvious to most.    Atlanta is a nice focal point to see the differences.   Where were the protests when Turner (aka Jane Fonda&#8217;s husband) owned sports teams?   What about the reinstatement of Michael Vick?  So to the NFL a conservative is more toxic then a Communist, Dog Killer..add in illegal drug use, multiple prescription drug addicts (interesting this was brought up as a reason to NOT allow Limbaugh), wife and girlfriend beatings, the knife fights and that is your a pristine NFL.</p>
<p>Now Limbaugh is not alone in being left out of the NFL.  You have Plaxico&#8230;maybe it was the gun ownership (2nd ammendment) itself and not the unlawful discharge that got them angry.</p>
<p>When George Soros was interested in buying a team (in a 100% capitalistic move against his &#8220;beliefs&#8221;),  any question by Republicans was said to be over-sensitive and politically motivated.  Well said.   No one seems to have an issue with Kieth Olberman trying to make his way back in sports from the deep political left or Fergie (<a class="l" onmousedown="return rwt(this,'','','res','1','AFQjCNE-BC8sd7Lyr24IH_29RSKAxSOeWA','&amp;sig2=M3Je6-5kanttXKoLTvikSQ','0CA4QFjAA')" href="http://www.sportingnews.com/blog/The_Trenches/entry/view/38852/nfl_owners_approve_fergie_as_dolphins_investor_"><em>NFL</em> Owners Approve Fergie as Dolphins Investor</a>).</p>
<p>A few other well stated articles highlight this bias as well:</p>
<p>American Thinker: <a href="American Thinker dead on about &quot;racism&quot; and &quot;diversity&quot;. http://bit.ly/2EQmso via @addthis #tcot" target="_blank">The NFL&#8217;s Diversity Problem </a></p>
<p>The Wall Steet Journal: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704322004574475681181683914.html" target="_blank">The NFL punts to left-wing political intimidation</a>.</p>
<p>NewsBusters:   <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/julia-seymour/2009/10/16/networks-cover-bogus-balloon-boy-story-100-times-more-made-limbaugh-q" target="_blank">Networks cover Bosgus baloon story 100x more then bogus Limbaugh quotes</a>.</p>
<p>The outright anger against conservatives is palpable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/10/american-thinker-hits-the-nfl-and-says-it-well.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama a muppet or the puppet master?</title>
		<link>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/02/is-obama-a-muppet-or-the-puppet-master.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/02/is-obama-a-muppet-or-the-puppet-master.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed F Bias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[left wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://editedforbias.wordpress.com/2009/02/26/is-obama-a-muppet-or-the-puppet-master/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Those that know me well, know that, during the election, I had the opinion that Obama was a muppet. May argued he was left wing, and that may be true. Other argues that he was more center-left. Though I believed that he was likely far more left then his words, what he said and what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those that know me well, know that, during the election, I had the opinion that Obama was a <span class="blsp-spelling-error">muppet</span>. May <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">argued</span> he was left wing, and that may be true. Other argues that he was more center-left. <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Though</span> I believed that he was likely far more left then his words, what he said and what he believed was of little consequence in this election. Besides foreign affairs the President if mostly a figurehead. He <span class="blsp-spelling-error">has</span> little to do with writing or <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">enforcing</span> law. In this case a figurehead for Nancy <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Pelosi</span> and Harry Reid.</p>
<p>I hoped that I was wrong or even if I was right that he would have a mandate and the quest for power would allow him to manage congress. But like the old Star <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Trek</span> episode, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patterns_of_Force_(TOS_episode)">&#8220;Patterns Of Force&#8221; </a>where they &#8220;instituted a theoretical form of Hitler&#8217;s National Socialism upon the lawless <span class="blsp-spelling-error">Ekosians</span> because he believed that it is the most efficient system of government ever devised&#8221;, the government has taken over and <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">supplanted</span> the figurehead.</p>
<p>Obama talked about &#8220;fixing roads&#8221; and &#8220;<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">helping</span> the states&#8221; yet the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">stimulus</span> bill is full of pork and pet projects that dwarf the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">valuable</span> spending. Now we have a &#8220;funding bill&#8221; that is full over 4900+ earmarked projects. So I, I believed that I was right. That he had no power and no control over the Congressional leadership and that they he was a puppet to the <span class="blsp-spelling-error">puppet</span> masters.</p>
<p>At least I <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">thought</span> I was right until Tuesday and Wednesday. He spoke the other night about restoring the upper tax brackets to those under Clinton. To cut spending in non-<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">critical</span> programs and cut the deficit in half in 4 years. Then the news about his plan began to release on Wednesday including 650+ Billion to begin universal <span class="blsp-spelling-error">healthcare</span>. The numbers simply <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123561551065378405.html">do not add up.</a> Then the tax increases began to to leak; including limiting home interest deductions [that <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">should</span> help the housing market]. A total &#8220;estimated&#8221; budget of 3.7 trillion on tax payer funded income of 2 trillion. If the economy contracts a bit more and/or the price tag goes up (duh) then we are talking about government spending on a pace that is double revenues. This does not include the &#8220;one time&#8221; spending in the bailouts. So we are looking a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">deficits</span> that would require tax revenues to double or triple in the coming years.</p>
<p>There is no amount of taxation on &#8220;the rich&#8221; that can cover that bill. Since over 40% of wage earners already pay zero income tax, this burden will be <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">carried</span> by the ever decreasing population of the employed &#8220;<span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">wealthy</span>&#8221; [which will now be defined as anyone that makes over the median income]. The GDP of the US is estimated to be 13.75 Trillion dollars in 2008. So we are talking about taxation at 30% of all GDP (higher to cover the bailouts). To put that in <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">perspective</span>: taxation has never been over 20% of GDP. In fact it is well understood that tax <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/images/chart5_lg_1.gif">revenue and GDP are tied tightly together at about 18.5%</a>. [I have found <a href="http://www.economist.com/markets/indicators/displaystory.cfm?story_id=12480352">reputable sources </a>that have out tax burden at about 30% already. Based on 13.75 Trillion in GDP and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tax_revenue_by_state">2.67 Trillion </a>in revenue..my simple math gives me 19.4%] . So we will need to get from 2.67 Trillion to well over 4 trillion [note that none of this includes growth in already expanding government programs].</p>
<p>Now it is <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">possible</span> that we will not actually pay for this. Seems that &#8220;paying for things&#8221; is simply out of vogue right now. But either we will pay for it or our children and grandchildren will pay for it with interest.</p>
<p>Based in these simple facts, I have come to the <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">unfortunate</span> conclusion that the puppet is part of the game (that reminds me of a <a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0734636/"><span class="blsp-spelling-error">Twlight</span> Zone episode</a>). That he is using his popularity and oratory skills to say what we want to hear and then turn around and sell us out. So it looks like, some where right, he is a left wing liberal and intent on creating a <span class="blsp-spelling-corrected">socialist</span> republic within the United States with an overall tax burden of 40+%. Either that, or his economists have failed 5<span class="blsp-spelling-error">th</span> grade math and they are completely inept (since they don&#8217;t pay taxes maybe this is the lesser of two evils). 2010 is coming, I pray we will not be too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/02/is-obama-a-muppet-or-the-puppet-master.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

