<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>www.editedforbias.com &#187; memos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.editedforbias.com/tag/memos/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.editedforbias.com</link>
	<description>Leveraging the power of community to combat the power of the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 19:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&quot;Torture&quot; edited for bias style</title>
		<link>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/04/torture-edited-for-bias-style.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/04/torture-edited-for-bias-style.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ed F Bias</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[memos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tcot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://editedforbias.wordpress.com/2009/04/17/torture-edited-for-bias-style/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are the headlines&#8230;</p> <p>Washington Post: Interrogation Details EmergeCNN: Bush-era interrogation memo: No torture without &#8216;severe pain&#8217; intentNew York Times: Interrogation Memos Detail Harsh Tactics by the C.I.A.LA Times: Memos reveal CIA interrogation methodsWall Street Journal: CIA Memos Released; Immunity for Harsh Tactics[note headline on home page differs No Prosecution for Waterboarding ]Fox News: Administration: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are the headlines&#8230;</p>
<p>Washington Post: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/16/AR2009041602768.html?hpid=topnews">Interrogation Details Emerge</a><br />CNN: <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/16/us.torture.documents/index.html">Bush-era interrogation memo: No torture without &#8216;severe pain&#8217; intent</a><br />New York Times: <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/17/us/politics/17detain.html?hp">Interrogation Memos Detail Harsh Tactics by the C.I.A.</a><br />LA Times: <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-interrogation17-2009apr17,0,5555846.story">Memos reveal CIA interrogation methods</a><br />Wall Street Journal: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123990682923525977.html">CIA Memos Released; Immunity for Harsh Tactics</a><br />[note headline on home page differs <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123990682923525977.html">No Prosecution for Waterboarding </a>]<br />Fox News: <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/16/obama-administration-says-charges-cia-officials-waterboarding/">Administration: No Charges Against Waterboarders</a></p>
<p>Scoring on the bias scale; I would commend the Washington Post and LA Times headliners.   New York Times [shock] is the most liberally biased headline.   CNN is not bad but adds a bit of detail to the headline.   WSJ is interesting&#8230; the front page is taking a completely different angle then the headline of the article itself&#8230; [different folks with different philosophies?].   Fox loses on the the conservative end of the scale for missing the whole release of the documents and jumping to the end story.</p>
<p><strong>On to the content</strong>&#8230;[in progress]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.editedforbias.com/2009/04/torture-edited-for-bias-style.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

